Contents
- Introduction
- Rating Tables
- Range of Motion
- Pain
- Osteomyelitis
- Nerve Root Compression Lesions of the Spine and Spinal Cord Injury or Disease
- Cervical Spine
- Thoracic Spine
- Lumbar Spine
- Section 1 - Determining Impairment Assessments of Musculoskeletal Upper Limb and Chest Conditions
- Selection of Tables and Charts
- Loss of Function - Upper Limb
- Loss of Function - Upper Limb - Shoulder
- Loss of Function - Upper Limb - Elbow
- Loss of Function - Upper Limb - Wrist
- Loss of Function - Upper Limb - Thumb and Fingers
- Other Impairment - Fractures and Miscellaneous Musculoskeletal Conditions of the Upper Limb and Chest
- Other Impairment - Upper Limb Amputations
- Other Impairment - Osteomyelitis - Upper Limb
- Tables, Steps and Charts
- Table 17.1 - Loss of Function - Upper Limb
- Steps to Determine the Upper Limb Musculoskeletal Assessment
- Table 17.2 - Loss of Function - Upper Limb - Shoulder
- Steps to Determine Musculoskeletal Assessment - Shoulder
- Table 17.3 - Loss of Function - Upper Limb - Elbow
- Steps to Determine Musculoskeletal Assessment - Elbow
- Table 17.4 - Loss of Function - Upper Limb Wrist
- Steps to Determine Musculoskeletal Assessment - Wrist
- Table 17.5 - Loss of Function - Upper Limb - Thumb and Fingers
- Steps to Determine Musculoskeletal Assessment - Thumb and Fingers
- Table 17.6 - Other Impairment - Fractures and Miscellaneous Musculoskeletal Conditions Upper Limb and Chest
- Steps to Determine Assessment - Fractures and Miscellaneous Musculoskeletal Conditions Upper Limb and Chest
- Table 17.7 - Other Impairment - Upper Limb - Amputations
- Steps to Determine Musculoskeletal Assessment Upper Limb Amputations
- Table 17.8 - Other Impairment - Osteomyelitis - Upper Limb
- Steps to Determine Osteomyelitis of the Upper Limb
- Chart 1 - Optimal Position of Ankylosis of Joints - Upper Limb
- Chart 2 - Average Range of Joint Motion - Upper Limb
- Section 2 - Determining Impairment Assessments of Musculoskeletal Lower Limb Conditions
- Selection of Tables
- Loss of Function - Lower Limb
- Loss of Function - Lower Limb - Hip
- Loss of Function - Lower Limb - Knee
- Loss of Function - Lower Limb - Ankle
- Loss of Function - Lower Limb - Feet and Toes
- Other Impairment - Fractures of Lower Limbs
- Other Impairment - Lower Limb - Amputations
- Other Impairment - Osteomyelitis - Lower Limbs
- Tables, Steps and Charts
- Table 17.9 - Loss of Function Lower Limb
- Steps to Determine the Musculoskeletal Assessment Lower Limb
- Table 17.10 - Loss of Function - Lower Limb Hip
- Steps to Determine the Musculoskeletal Assessment - Hip
- Table 17.11 - Loss of Function - Lower Limb Knee
- Steps to Determine the Musculoskeletal Assessment - Knee
- Table 17.12 - Loss of Function Lower Limb - Ankle
- Steps to Determine the Musculoskeletal Assessment - Ankle
- Table 17.13 - Loss of Function - Lower Limb - Feet and Toes
- Steps to Determine the Musculoskeletal Assessment - Feet and Toes
- Table 17.14 - Other Impairment - Fractures of Lower Limbs
- Steps to Determine Musculoskeletal Assessment Fractures Lower Limb
- Table 17.15 - Other Impairment - Lower Limb - Amputations
- Steps to Determine Musculoskeletal Assessment - Lower Limb Amputations
- Table 17.16 - Other Impairment - Osteomyelitis - Lower Limbs
- Steps to Determine the Lower Limb Osteomyelitis Assessment
- Chart 3 - Optimal Position of Joint Ankylosis - Lower Limb
- Chart 4 - Average Range of Motion of Joints - Lower Limb
- Section 3 - Determining Impairment Assessments of Musculoskeletal Spine, Pelvis and Sacroiliac Joints
- Selection of Tables
- Loss of Function - Spine
- Loss of Function - Thoracic Spine
- Loss of Function - Lumbar Spine
- Other Impairment - Coccyx, Pelvis and Sacroiliac Joint Conditions
- Other Impairment - Osteomyelitis - Spine and Pelvis
- Tables, Steps and Charts
- Table 17.17 - Loss of Function - Cervical Spine
- Steps to Determine the Assessment for Musculoskeletal Cervical Spine Conditions (Nerve Root Compression Only, e.g. C5, C6, C7 and C8)
- Steps to Determine the Assessment for Musculoskeletal Cervical Spine Conditions (Spinal Cord Injury or Disease - Upper Limb Involvement Only)
- Steps to Determine the Assessment for Musculoskeletal Cervical Spine Conditions (Spinal Cord Injury or Disease - Upper and Lower Limb Involvement)
- Table 17.18 - Loss of Function - Thoracic Spine
- Steps to Determine Musculoskeletal Thoracic Spine Assessment (Nerve Root Compression Only)
- Steps to Determine the Musculoskeletal Thoracic Spine Assessment (Spinal Cord Injury or Disease - Upper Limb Involvement Only)
- Steps to Determine the Musculoskeletal Thoracic Spine Assessment (Spinal Cord Injury or Disease - Lower Limb Involvement Only)
- Steps to Determine the Musculoskeletal Thoracic Spine Assessment (Spinal Cord Injury or Disease - Upper and Lower Limb Involvement)
- Table 17.19 - Loss of Function - Lumbar Spine
- Steps to Determine the Assessment for Musculoskeletal Lumbar Spine (Nerve Root Compression Only, e.g. L4, L5 and S1)
- Steps to Determine the Assessment for Musculoskeletal Lumbar Spine (Spinal Cord Injury or Disease - Lower Limb Involvement)
- Table 17.20 - Other Impairment - Coccyx, Pelvis, and Sacroiliac Joints
- Steps to Determine the Musculoskeletal Assessment Coccyx, Pelvis and Sacroiliac Joint(s)
- Table 17.21 - Other Impairment - Osteomyelitis - Spine and Pelvis
- Steps to Determine Assessment from Osteomyelitis - Spine and Pelvis
- Chart 5 - Average Range of Joint Motion - Spine
- Chart 6 - Nerve Root Compression Syndromes
Introduction
This chapter provides criteria for assessing permanent impairment from entitled musculoskeletal conditions. The primary function of the musculoskeletal system is the performance of normal body movements with normal strength, speed, co-ordination and endurance to carry out everyday activities.
The chapter is divided into three sections. The first section provides criteria to assess impairment of the upper limbs and musculoskeletal chest conditions. The second section provides criteria to assess impairment of the lower limbs. The third section provides criteria to assess impairment of the spine, pelvis and sacroiliac joints. Each section contains a table to rate osteomyelitis.
Fractures of the bones of the upper and lower limbs that do not involve a joint surface and that have healed without angulation, deformity or shortening, are not considered to cause any permanent impairment and are assessed at nil. Similarly, uncomplicated fractures of the clavicle, sternum, scapula and ribs are not considered to cause any permanent impairment and are assessed at nil.
Impairment associated with a joint replacement is rated from loss of function criteria and no additional rating is given for the presence of a prosthetic joint.
Peripheral vascular disease is rated within Chapter 13, Hypertension and Vascular Impairment. If amputation occurs as a result of peripheral vascular disease, an additional rating is given using the Amputation Table within this chapter. Ratings from Chapter 13 and the Amputation Table are then added.
Varicose vein conditions are rated within Chapter 13, Hypertension and Vascular Impairment. If amputation occurs as a result of varicose vein conditions, a rating is also given using the Amputation Table within this chapter. Ratings from Chapter 13 and the Amputation Table are compared and the highest selected.
Frostbite, immersion foot and other cold conditions are rated within Chapter 13, Hypertension and Vascular Impairment. If amputation occurs as a result of frostbite, immersion foot and other cold conditions, a rating is also given using the Amputation Table within this chapter. Ratings from Chapter 13 and the Amputation Table are compared and the highest selected.
Conditions with neurologic involvement that are rated within this chapter include:
- brain injury or disease resulting only in upper or lower limb effects but not both
- spinal cord injury or disease (including central spinal stenosis, but excluding spinal cord injury or disease which affects the function of both the upper and lower limbs)
- nerve root compression lesions of the spine
- complex regional pain syndromes Type 1 and Type 2
- compartment syndrome
- thoracic outlet syndrome
- peripheral neurological conditions affecting the limbs which are not rated from Table 20.5 contained within Chapter 20, Neurological Impairment.
A rating is not given from this chapter for the conditions listed below. Each bullet indicates the appropriate chapter to be used.
- Impairment from spinal cord injury or disease which affects the function of both the upper and lower limbs is rated within Chapter 19, Activities of Daily Living.
- Impairment from peripheral vascular conditions is rated within Chapter 13, Hypertension and Vascular Impairment.
- Impairment from pain disorders recognized in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) and chronic pain syndrome is rated within Chapter 21, Psychiatric Impairment and Chapter 19, Activities of Daily Living. The ratings are compared and the highest selected.
- Impairment from musculoskeletal conditions that have global body effects such as rheumatoid arthritis, generalized osteoarthritis and ankylosing spondylitis is rated within Chapter 19, Activities of Daily Living.
- Thoracic outlet syndrome causing vascular impairment only is rated within Chapter 13, Hypertension and Vascular Impairment.
- Impairment from thoracoplasty due to tuberculosis is rated within Chapter 24, Tuberculosis Impairment.
- Impairment from malignant musculoskeletal conditions is rated within Chapter 18, Malignant Impairment. Follow the steps contained within the Malignant Impairment chapter.
Rating Tables and Charts
This chapter contains thirteen “Loss of Function” tables and eight “Other Impairment” tables which may be used to rate entitled musculoskeletal conditions. Six reference charts are also included within this chapter. Five of these charts provide values for the optimal position of an ankylosed joint and the average range of motion of joints. One chart describes nerve root compression effects.
The tables and charts within this chapter are:
Table | Loss of Function | Other Impairment |
---|---|---|
Table 17.1 | Loss of Function - Upper Limb | This table is used to rate impairment from musculoskeletal conditions which impact on the function of the upper limb as a whole. |
Table 17.2 | Loss of Function - Upper Limb - Shoulder | This table is used to rate impairment from musculoskeletal conditions affecting the active range of motion in the shoulder. |
Table 17.3 | Loss of Function - Upper Limb - Elbow | This table is used to rate impairment from musculoskeletal conditions affecting the active range of motion in the elbow. |
Table 17.4 | Loss of Function - Upper Limb - Wrist | This table is used to rate impairment from musculoskeletal conditions affecting the active range of motion in the wrist. |
Table 17.5 | Loss of Function - Upper Limb - Thumb and Fingers | This table is used to rate impairment from musculoskeletal conditions affecting the active range of motion of the thumb and fingers. |
Table 17.6 | Other Impairment - Fractures and Miscellaneous Musculoskeletal Conditions Upper Limb and Chest | This table is used to rate impairment from fractures and miscellaneous musculoskeletal conditions of the upper limb and chest. |
Table 17.7 | Other Impairment - Upper Limb - Amputations | This table is used to rate impairment from upper limb amputations. |
Table 17.8 | Other Impairment -Osteomyelitis - Upper Limb | This table is used to rate impairment from osteomyelitis of the upper limb. |
Table 17.9 | Loss of Function - Lower Limb | This table is used to rate impairment from musculoskeletal conditions which impact on the function of the lower limbs as a whole. |
Table 17.10 | Loss of Function - Lower Limb - Hip | This table is used to rate impairment from musculoskeletal conditions which affect the active range of motion of the hip. |
Table 17.11 | Loss of Function - Lower Limb - Knee | This table is used to rate impairment from musculoskeletal conditions which affect the active range of motion of the knee. |
Table 17.12 | Loss of Function - Lower Limb - Ankle | This table is used to rate impairment from musculoskeletal conditions which affect the active range of motion of the ankle. |
Table 17.13 | Loss of Function - Lower Limb - Feet and Toes | This table is used to rate impairment from musculoskeletal conditions of the feet and toes. |
Table 17.14 | Other Impairment - Fractures of Lower Limbs | This table is used to rate impairment from fractures of the lower limbs. |
Table 17.15 | Other Impairment - Lower Limb - Amputations | This table is used to rate impairment from lower limb amputations. |
Table 17.16 | Other Impairment - Osteomyelitis - Lower Limbs | This table is used to rate impairment from osteomyelitis of the lower limbs. |
Table 17.17 | Loss of Function - Cervical Spine | This table is used to rate impairment from musculoskeletal conditions affecting the cervical spine. |
Table 17.18 | Loss of Function - Thoracic Spine | This table is used to rate impairment from musculoskeletal conditions affecting the thoracic spine. |
Table 17.19 | Loss of Function - Lumbar Spine | This table is used to rate impairment from musculoskeletal conditions affecting the lumbar spine. |
Table 17.20 | Other Impairment - Coccyx, Pelvis, and Sacroiliac Joints | This table is used to rate impairment from musculoskeletal conditions affecting the coccyx, pelvis and sacroiliac joints. |
Table 17.21 | Other Impairment -Osteomyelitis - Spine and Pelvis | This table is used to rate impairment from osteomyelitis of the spine and pelvis. |
Chart 1 | Optimal Position of Joint Ankylosis - Upper Limb | This chart provides values for the optimal position of an ankylosed joint of the upper limb. |
Chart 2 | Average Range of Joint Motion - Upper Limb | This chart provides values for the average range of motion of specific joints of the upper limb. |
Chart 3 | Optimal Position of Joint Ankylosis - Lower Limb | This chart provides values for the optimal position of an ankylosed joint of the lower limb. |
Chart 4 | Average Range of Joint Motion - Lower Limb | This chart provides values for the average range of motion of specific joints of the lower limb. |
Chart 5 | Average Range of Joint Motion - Spine | This chart provides values for the average range of motion of the spine. |
Chart 6 | Nerve Root Compression Syndromes | This chart describes nerve root compression effects. |
Range of Motion
The loss of function tables in this chapter are based on active (independent) range of motion. The active range of all movements in all joints should be recorded in degrees. Range of motion is measured from the anatomical neutral position in all joints with the exception of supination and pronation of the forearm which is measured from the neutral forearm position (mid supination/pronation). Use of a goniometer is preferred; however, visual assessment of degrees of movement is acceptable. Reference charts are provided indicating normal values for range of motion and optimal position of ankylosis of joints.
In any specific joint, certain movements of that joint are considered functionally more important. This functional importance has been considered and is reflected in the rating tables.
Pain
Ratings in the musculoskeletal impairment tables take into account the presence of pain which may accompany the musculoskeletal impairment and that may limit range of motion or function. In the musculoskeletal tables, pain is considered to be a part of many conditions and is considered to be present in most instances beyond minimal levels of impairment. The presence of pain, when introduced at a particular level in a table, is considered to be a distinguishing factor between rating levels. Once pain is identified to exist, it is considered to be present at successive levels.
Osteomyelitis
A rating is determined from the applicable table for each entitled osteomyelitis condition.
Nerve Root Compression Lesions of the Spine and Spinal Cord Injury or Disease
The following instructions are to be followed when determining ratings for nerve root compression lesions of the spine and/or spinal cord injury or disease.
Cervical Spine
- Nerve root compression lesions due to a cervical spine condition are rated within Table 17.17 - Loss of Function - Cervical Spine.
- Spinal cord injury or disease at the cervical levels with neurological involvement of the upper limbs is rated within Table 17.1 - Loss of Function - Upper Limb. If the cervical spine is to be rated, the Table 17.1 rating is compared to the Table 17.17 - Loss of Function - Cervical Spine rating and the higher selected.
- Spinal cord injury or disease at the cervical levels with neurological involvement of both the upper and lower limbs is rated within Chapter 19, Activities of Daily Living. If the cervical spine is to be rated, the rating is compared to the Table 17.17 - Loss of Function - Cervical Spine rating and the highest selected.
Thoracic Spine
- Nerve root compression lesions due to a thoracic spine condition are rated on individual merits.
- Spinal cord injury or disease at the thoracic levels with neurological involvement of the upper limbs is rated within Table 17.1 - Loss of Function - Upper Limb. If the thoracic spine is to be rated, the Table 17.1 rating is compared to the Table 17.18 - Loss of Function - Thoracic Spine rating and the highest selected.
- Spinal cord injury or disease at the thoracic levels with neurological involvement of the lower limbs is rated within Table 17.9 - Loss of Function - Lower Limb. If the thoracic spine is to be rated, the Table 17.9 rating is compared to the Table 17.18 - Loss of Function - Thoracic Spine rating and the highest selected.
- Spinal cord injury or disease at the thoracic levels with neurological involvement of both the upper and lower limbs is rated within Chapter 19, Activities of Daily Living. If the thoracic spine is to be rated, the Chapter 19 rating is compared to the Table 17.18 - Loss of Function - Thoracic Spine rating and the highest selected.
Lumbar Spine
- Nerve root compression lesions due to a lumbar spine condition are rated within Table 17.19 - Loss of Function - Lumbar Spine.
- Spinal cord injury or disease at the lumbar levels with neurological involvement of the lower limbs is rated within Table 17.9 - Loss of Function - Lower Limb. If the lumbar spine is to be rated, the Table 17.9 rating is compared to the Table 17.19 - Loss of Function - Lumbar Spine rating and the highest selected.
- Cauda equina syndrome is rated on individual merits.
Section 1 - Determining Impairment Assessments of Musculoskeletal Upper Limb and Chest Conditions
When rating impairment of the upper limbs, a higher rating may be appropriate for the dominant upper limb. When applicable, the tables within this section indicate ratings for both the dominant and non-dominant upper limb.
Selection of Tables and Charts
The tables that may be used to rate impairment from musculoskeletal upper limb and chest conditions are:
Table | Loss of Function | Other Impairment |
---|---|---|
Table 17.1 | Loss of Function - Upper Limb | This table is used to rate impairment from musculoskeletal conditions which impact on the function of the upper limb as a whole. |
Table 17.2 | Loss of Function - Upper Limb - Shoulder | This table is used to rate impairment from musculoskeletal conditions affecting the active range of motion of the shoulder. |
Table 17.3 | Loss of Function - Upper Limb - Elbow | This table is used to rate impairment from musculoskeletal conditions affecting the active range of motion of the elbow. |
Table 17.4 | Loss of Function - Upper Limb - Wrist | This table is used to rate impairment from musculoskeletal conditions affecting the active range of motion of the wrist. |
Table 17.5 | Loss of Function - Upper Limb - Thumb and Fingers | This table is used to rate impairment from musculoskeletal conditions affecting the active range of motion of the thumb and fingers. |
Table 17.6 | Other Impairment - Fractures and Miscellaneous Musculoskeletal Conditions Upper Limbs and Chest | This table is used to rate impairment from fractures and miscellaneous musculoskeletal conditions of the upper limb and chest. |
Table 17.7 | Other Impairment - Upper Limb - Amputations | This table is used to rate impairment from upper limb amputations. |
Table 17.8 | Other Impairment -Osteomyelitis - Upper Limb | This table is used to rate impairment from osteomyelitis of the upper limb. |
Chart 1 | Optimal Position of Joint Ankylosis - Upper Limb | This chart provides values for the optimal position of an ankylosed joint of the upper limb. |
Chart 2 | Average Range of Joint Motion - Upper Limb | This chart provides values for the average range of motion of specific joints of the upper limb. |
Loss of Function - Upper Limb
Table 17.1 provides criteria for evaluating the ability to use the upper limb as whole in performing every day activities. Only one rating may be selected for each upper limb. If more than one rating is applicable, the ratings are compared and the highest selected.
This table is used to rate specific conditions which include the following:
- brain injury or disease which affects the function of one or both upper limb(s)
- spinal cord injury or disease which affects the function of one or both upper limb(s)
- complex regional pain syndromes Type 1 and Type 2 of the upper limb(s)
- compartment syndrome of the upper limb(s)
- thoracic outlet syndrome affecting the upper limb(s)
- peripheral neurological conditions affecting the upper limb(s) which are not rated from Table 20.5 contained within Chapter 20, Neurological Impairment.
In cases of spinal cord injury or disease, refer to the instructions provided in the Introduction of this chapter.
If more than one condition of the same limb is to be rated from Table 17.1, the conditions are bracketed for assessment purposes.
When entitled upper limb conditions result in permanent impairment of other organ systems, a consequential entitlement decision is required. If awarded, the resulting impairment of that organ system(s) will be rated using the applicable body system specific table(s).
If non-entitled conditions or conditions rated within another chapter/table of the Table of Disabilities are contributing to the overall impairment, then the Partially Contributing Table (PCT) must be applied to arrive at the rating which is due to the entitled condition(s) rated within this table.
Loss of Function - Upper Limb - Shoulder
Table 17.2 is used to rate impairment from musculoskeletal conditions of the shoulder. Only one rating may be selected for each shoulder. If more than one rating is applicable, the ratings are compared and the highest selected.
If more than one shoulder condition of the same limb is to be rated from Table 17.2, the conditions are bracketed for assessment purposes.
When entitled upper limb shoulder conditions result in permanent impairment of other organ systems, a consequential entitlement decision is required. If awarded, the resulting impairment of that organ system(s) will be rated using the applicable body system specific table(s).
If non-entitled conditions or conditions rated within another chapter/table of the Table of Disabilities are contributing to the overall impairment, then the PCT must be applied to arrive at the rating which is due to the entitled condition(s) rated within this table.
Loss of Function - Upper Limb - Elbow
Table 17.3 is used to rate impairment from musculoskeletal conditions of the elbow. Only one rating may be selected for each elbow. If more than one rating is applicable, the ratings are compared and the highest selected.
If more than one elbow condition of the same limb is to be rated from Table 17.3, the conditions are bracketed for assessment purposes.
When entitled upper limb elbow conditions result in permanent impairment of other organ systems, a consequential entitlement decision is required. If awarded, the resulting impairment of that organ system(s) will be rated using the applicable body system specific table(s).
If non-entitled conditions or conditions rated within another chapter/table of the Table of Disabilities are contributing to the overall impairment, then the PCT must be applied to arrive at the rating which is due to the entitled condition(s) rated within this table.
Loss of Function - Upper Limb - Wrist
Table 17.4 is used to rate impairment from musculoskeletal conditions of the wrist. Only one rating may be selected for each wrist. If more than one rating is applicable, the ratings are compared and the highest selected.
If more than one wrist condition of the same limb is to be rated from Table 17.4, the conditions are bracketed for assessment purposes.
When entitled upper limb wrist conditions result in permanent impairment of other organ systems, a consequential entitlement decision is required. If awarded, the resulting impairment of that organ system(s) will be rated using the applicable body system specific table(s).
If non-entitled conditions or conditions rated within another chapter/table of the Table of Disabilities are contributing to the overall impairment, then the PCT must be applied to arrive at the rating which is due to the entitled condition(s) rated within this table.
Loss of Function - Upper Limb - Thumb and Fingers
Table 17.5 is used to rate impairment from musculoskeletal conditions of the thumbs and fingers. One rating may be selected for each digit from Table 17.5. If more than one rating is applicable for a single digit, the ratings are compared and the highest selected.
If more than one condition of a single digit is entitled, the conditions are bracketed for assessment purposes.
When entitled upper limb thumb and finger conditions result in permanent impairment of other organ systems, a consequential entitlement decision is required. If awarded, the resulting impairment of that organ system(s) will be rated using the applicable body system specific table(s).
If non-entitled conditions or conditions rated within another chapter/table of the Table of Disabilities are contributing to the overall impairment, then the PCT must be applied to arrive at the rating which is due to the entitled condition(s) rated within this table.
Other Impairment - Fractures and Miscellaneous Musculoskeletal Conditions of the Upper Limb and Chest
Table 17.6 is used to rate impairment from fractures and miscellaneous musculoskeletal conditions of the upper limb and chest. One rating may be selected for each entitled condition. If more than one rating is applicable for an entitled condition, the ratings are compared and the highest selected.
If a fracture is intra-articular, the applicable joint table is also used to rate the impairment.
When entitled fractures and miscellaneous musculoskeletal conditions of the upper limb and chest result in permanent impairment of other organ systems, a consequential entitlement decision is required. If awarded, the resulting impairment of that organ system(s) will be rated using the applicable body system specific table(s).
If non-entitled conditions or conditions rated within another chapter/table of the Table of Disabilities are contributing to the overall impairment, then the PCT must be applied to arrive at the rating which is due to the entitled condition(s) rated within this table.
Other Impairment - Upper Limb Amputations
Table 17.7 is used to rate impairment from upper limb amputations.
All amputations of the upper limb, regardless of the cause of the amputation (eg. vascular, trauma or infection), are rated from this table.
When previously entitled conditions are later removed by a newly entitled amputation, the new rating is based on Table 17.7 - Other Impairment - Upper Limb Amputations. However, in rare cases, if there is more than one entitled condition of an upper limb, the sum of the ratings could be higher than the amputation rating. In these cases, the ratings for the previously entitled conditions that applied immediately prior to the amputation are to be maintained.
When a non-entitled amputation removes a previously entitled condition(s), the rating for the entitled condition(s) that applied immediately prior to the amputation is to be maintained.
When entitled upper limb amputations result in permanent impairment of other organ systems, a consequential entitlement decision is required. If awarded, the resulting impairment of that organ system(s) will be rated using the applicable body system specific table(s).
If non-entitled conditions or conditions rated within another chapter/table of the Table of Disabilities are contributing to the overall impairment, then the PCT must be applied to arrive at the rating which is due to the entitled condition(s) rated within this table.
Other Impairment - Osteomyelitis - Upper Limb
Table 17.8 is used to rate impairment from osteomyelitis of the upper limb. One rating may be selected for each area of osteomyelitis. If more than one rating is applicable for an area, the ratings are compared and the highest selected.
When entitled osteomyelitis of the upper limb results in permanent impairment of other organ systems, a consequential entitlement decision is required. If awarded, the resulting impairment of that organ system(s) will be rated using the applicable body system specific table(s).
If non-entitled conditions or conditions rated within another chapter/table of the Table of Disabilities are contributing to the overall impairment, then the PCT must be applied to arrive at the rating which is due to the entitled condition(s) rated within this table.
Tables, Steps and Charts
Table 17.1 - Loss of Function - Upper Limb
Only one rating may be given for each upper limb from Table 17.1. If more than one rating is applicable, the ratings are compared and the highest selected.
Each bullet (•) represents one criterion. In order for a rating to be established for Table 17.1, follow the "ands" and "ors".
Dominant Rating | Non-Dominant Rating | Criteria |
---|---|---|
Nil | Nil |
|
Two | One |
|
Four | Two |
|
Nine | Four |
|
Thirteen | Nine |
|
Twenty-one | Thirteen |
|
Thirty-four | Twenty-one |
|
Thirty-four | Thirty-four |
|
Fifty-two | Thirty-nine |
|
* Intractable pain is severe, persistent, ongoing pain that is unresponsive to the usual treatment modalities.
Steps to Determine the Upper Limb Musculoskeletal Assessment
- Step 1:
-
Determine the rating from Table 17.1 (Loss of Function - Upper Limb).
Note: Table 17.1 is used to rate specific conditions which include the following:
- brain injury or disease which affects the function of one or both upper limb(s)
- spinal cord injury or disease which affects the function of one or both upper limb(s)
- complex regional pain syndromes Type 1 and Type 2 of the upper limb(s)
- compartment syndrome of the upper limb(s)
- thoracic outlet syndrome affecting the upper limb(s)
- peripheral neurological conditions affecting the upper limb(s) which are not rated from Table 20.5 contained within Chapter 20, Neurological Impairment.
If more than one entitled upper limb condition in a single limb is to be assessed from Table 17.1, the conditions must be bracketed.
- Step 2:
- Does the Partially Contributing Table apply? If yes, then apply to Step 1 rating.
- Step 3:
- Determine the Quality of Life rating.
- Step 4:
- Add the ratings at Step 2 and Step 3.
- Step 5:
- If partial entitlement exists, apply to rating at Step 4
This is the Disability Assessment.
Table 17.2- Loss of Function - Upper Limb - Shoulder
Only one rating may be given for each shoulder from Table 17.2. If more than one rating is applicable, the ratings are compared and the highest selected.
Each bullet (•) represents one criterion. In order for a rating to be established for Table 17.2, follow the "ands" and "ors".
Dominant Rating | Non-Dominant Rating | Criteria |
---|---|---|
Nil | Nil |
|
Four | Two |
|
Nine | Four |
|
Thirteen | Nine |
|
Twenty-one | Thirteen |
|
Twenty-six | Twenty-three |
|
Thirty-four | Twenty-six |
|
Fifty-two | Forty-five |
|
* Flail joint is a joint exhibiting abnormal and paradoxical mobility.
Steps to Determine Musculoskeletal Assessment - Shoulder
- Step 1:
-
Determine the rating from Table 17.2 (Loss of Function - Upper Limb-Shoulder).
Note: If more than one shoulder condition in a single upper limb is to be rated, conditions must be bracketed.
- Step 2:
- Does the Partially Contributing Table apply? If yes, then apply to rating at Step 1.
- Step 3:
- Determine the Quality of Life rating.
- Step 4:
- Add the ratings at Step 2 and 3.
- Step 5:
- If partial entitlement exists, apply to the rating at Step 4.
This is the Disability Assessment.
Table 17.3 - Loss of Function - Upper Limb - Elbow
Only one rating may be given for each elbow from Table 17.3. If more than one rating is applicable, the ratings are compared and the highest selected.
Each bullet (•) represents one criterion. In order for a rating to be established for Table 17.3, follow the "ands" and "ors".
Dominant Rating | Non-Dominant Rating | Criteria |
---|---|---|
Nil | Nil |
|
Four | Two |
|
Nine | Four |
|
Thirteen | Nine |
|
Twenty-one | Thirteen |
|
Twenty-six | Twenty-three |
|
Thirty-four | Twenty-six |
|
* Flail joint is a joint exhibiting abnormal and paradoxical mobility.
Steps to Determine Musculoskeletal Assessment - Elbow
- Step 1:
-
Determine the rating from Table 17.3 (Loss of Function - Upper Limb - Elbow).
If more than one entitled elbow condition in a single upper limb is to be rated from Table 17.3, conditions must be bracketed.
- Step 2:
- Does the Partially Contributing Table apply? If yes, then apply to rating at Step 1.
- Step 3:
- Determine the Quality of Life rating.
- Step 4:
- Add ratings at Step 2 and Step 3.
- Step 5:
- If partial entitlement exists, apply to the rating at Step 4.
This is the Disability Assessment.
Table 17.4 - Loss of Function - Upper Limb - Wrist
Only one rating may be given for each wrist from Table 17.4. If more than one rating is applicable, the ratings are compared and the highest selected.
Each bullet (•) represents one criterion. In order for a rating to be established for Table 17.4, only one criterion must be met at a level of impairment for that rating to be selected.
Dominant Rating | Non-Dominant Rating | Criteria |
---|---|---|
Nil | Nil |
|
Four | Two |
|
Nine | Four |
|
Thirteen | Nine |
|
Eighteen | Twelve |
|
Twenty-one | Fifteen |
|
* Flail joint is a joint exhibiting abnormal and paradoxical mobility.
Steps to Determine Musculoskeletal Assessment - Wrist
- Step 1:
-
Determine the rating from Table 17.4 (Loss of Function - Upper Limb - Wrist).
Note: If more than one entitled wrist condition in a single limb is to be rated from Table 17.4, conditions must be bracketed.
- Step 2:
- Does the Partially Contributing Table apply? If yes, then apply to rating at Step 1.
- Step 3:
- Determine the Quality of Life rating.
- Step 4:
- Add the ratings at Step 2 and Step 3.
- Step 5:
- If partial entitlement exists, apply to the rating at Step 4.
This is the Disability Assessment.
Table 17.5 - Loss of Function - Upper Limb - Thumb and Fingers
Only one rating may be given for each digit from Table 17.5. If more than one rating is applicable for a single digit, the ratings are compared and the highest selected.
Each bullet (•) in Table 17.5 represents one criterion. In order for a rating to be established for Table 17.5, all criteria designated at that rating level must be met.
Thumb | ||
---|---|---|
Dominant Rating | Non-Dominant Rating | Criteria |
One | Nil |
|
Two | One |
|
Thirteen | Thirteen |
|
Eighteen | Eighteen |
|
Index or Middle Finger | ||
Dominant Rating | Non-Dominant Rating | Criteria |
One | Nil |
|
Two | One |
|
Five | Three |
|
Nine | Four |
|
Ring or Little Finger | ||
Dominant Rating | Non-Dominant Rating | Criteria |
Nil | Nil |
|
One | Nil |
|
Two | One |
|
Three | Two |
|
Steps to Determine Musculoskeletal Assessment - Thumb and Fingers
- Step 1:
-
Determine the rating from Table 17.5 (Loss of Function - Upper Limb - Thumb and Fingers).
Note: One rating may be selected for each digit from Table 17.5. However, if more than one condition in a single digit is entitled, the conditions must be bracketed for assessment purposes. The applicable ratings are compared and the highest selected.
- Step 2:
- Does the Partially Contributing Table apply? If yes, then apply to rating at Step 1.
- Step 3:
- Determine the Quality of Life rating.
- Step 4:
- Add the ratings at Step 2 and Step 3
- Step 5:
- If partial entitlement exists, apply to rating at Step 4.
This is the Disability Assessment.
Table 17.6 - Other Impairment - Fractures and Miscellaneous Musculoskeletal Conditions of the Upper Limb and Chest
Only one rating may be given for each entitled condition from Table 17.6. If more than one rating is applicable for an entitled condition, the ratings are compared and the highest selected.
Each bullet (•) represents one criterion. In order for a rating to be established for Table 17.6, only one criterion must be met at a level of impairment for that rating to be selected.
Rating | Criteria |
---|---|
Nil |
|
One |
|
Two |
|
Three |
|
Four |
|
Fractures that result in non-union will be assessed on individual merits.
Steps to Determine Assessment - Fractures and Miscellaneous Musculoskeletal Conditions Upper Limb and Chest
- Step 1:
- Determine the rating fromTable 17.6 (Other Impairment - Fractures and Miscellaneous Conditions Upper Limb and Chest).
- Step 2:
- Does the Partially Contributing Table apply? If yes, then apply to rating at Step 1.
- Step 3:
- Determine the Quality of Life rating.
- Step 4:
- Add the ratings at Step 2 and Step 3.
- Step 5:
- If partial entitlement exists, apply to the rating at Step 4.
This is the Disability Assessment.
Table 17.7 - Other Impairment - Upper Limb - Amputations
Only one rating may be given for each entitled amputation condition or combination of entitled amputation conditions from Table 17.6. If more than one rating is applicable for an entitled condition or combination of entitled amputation conditions, the ratings are compared and the highest selected.
Each bullet (•) represents one criterion. In order for a rating to be established for Table 17.7, only one criterion must be met at a level of impairment for that rating to be selected.
Rating | Criteria |
---|---|
Little Finger | |
One |
|
Two |
|
Three |
|
Ring Finger | |
One |
|
Two |
|
Four |
|
Middle Finger | |
Two |
|
Four |
|
Nine |
|
Index Finger | |
Three |
|
Six |
|
Nine |
|
Thumb | |
Nine |
|
Thirteen |
|
Eighteen |
|
Other | |
Nine |
|
Twenty-one |
|
Twenty-six |
|
Thirty-four |
|
Thirty-nine |
|
Forty-three |
|
Fifty-two |
|
Sixty-one |
|
Sixty-eight |
|
Seventy-one |
|
Seventy-six |
|
Eighty-five |
|
* Forequarter amputation is an amputation of the entire shoulder joint with excision of a portion of the scapula as well as the clavicle.
Amputations not included in this table will be rated on individual merits.
Steps to Determine Musculoskeletal Assessment Upper Limb Amputations
- Step 1:
- Determine the rating from Table 17.7 (Other Impairment - Upper Limb-Amputations).
- Step 2:
- Does the Partially Contributing Table apply? If yes, then apply to rating(s) at Step 1.
- Step 3:
- Determine the Quality of Life rating(s).
- Step 4:
- Add the ratings at Step 2 and Step 3.
- Step 5:
- If partial entitlement exists, apply to the rating(s) at Step 4.
This is the Disability Assessment.
Table 17.8 - Other Impairment - Osteomyelitis - Upper Limb
One rating may be given for each area of osteomyelitis of the upper limb from Table 17.8. If more than one rating is applicable for an area, the ratings are compared and the highest selected.
Each bullet (•) represents one criterion. In order for a rating to be established for Table 17.8, only one criterion must be met at a level of impairment for that rating to be selected.
Rating | Criteria |
---|---|
One |
|
Four |
|
Nine |
|
Thirteen |
|
Steps to Determine Osteomyelitis of the Upper Limb
- Step 1:
-
Determine the rating from Table 17.8 (Other Impairment Upper Limb - Osteomyelitis).
Note: One rating may be given for each entitled area of osteomyelitis in the upper limb. The steps must be repeated for each area entitled.
- Step 2:
- Does the Partially Contributing Table apply? If yes, then apply to rating at Step 1.
- Step 3:
- Determine the Quality of Life rating.
- Step 4:
- Add the ratings at Step 2 and Step 3.
- Step 5:
- If partial entitlement exists, apply to the rating at Step 4.
This is the Disability Assessment.
Chart 1 - Optimal Position of Ankylosis of Joints - Upper Limb
The following values are a guide. The actual position of a surgical joint ankylosis may vary depending on the judgement of the surgeon taking into account the particular needs and circumstances of the Member/Veteran/Client.
Joint | Optimal Position of Ankylosis | |
---|---|---|
Shoulder | Gleno-humeral joint at 45̊ of abduction with forward elevation of 30̊ and external rotation of 20̊. | |
Elbow | 90-100̊ of flexion. | |
Wrist | 25-30̊ of dorsiflexion without any ulnar or radial deviation. | |
Thumb | ||
IP | 20̊ of flexion. | |
MCP | 25̊ of flexion. | |
CMC | The metacarpal in opposition. | |
Fingers | ||
DIP | 15-20̊ of flexion. | |
PIP | 40-50̊ of flexion. | |
MCP | 20-30̊ of flexion. |
Chart 2 - Average Range of Joint Motion - Upper Limb
All measurements in Chart 2 below are determined from an anatomical neutral position with the exception of supination and pronation of the forearm which are measured from the mid forearm neutral position.
Joint | Movement | Range of Movement | |
---|---|---|---|
Shoulder | Abduction | 180̊ | |
Flexion (forward elevation) | 170̊ | ||
External rotation | 90̊ | ||
Adduction | 45̊ | ||
Extension (backward elevation) | 30̊ | ||
Internal rotation | 90̊ | ||
Elbow | Flexion | 140̊ | |
Supination | 80̊ | ||
Extension | 0̊ | ||
Pronation | 80̊ | ||
Wrist | Extension (dorsiflexion) | 60̊ | |
Ulnar deviation | 30̊ | ||
Flexion (palmar flexion) | 70̊ | ||
Radial deviation | 20̊ | ||
Thumbs | |||
IP | Flexion | 90̊ | |
Extension | 20̊ | ||
MCP | Flexion | 50̊ | |
Extension | 0̊ | ||
CMC | Abduction | 70̊ | |
Adduction | 0̊ | ||
Opposition | Thumb to Fingers | ||
Fingers | |||
DIP | Flexion | 45-90̊ | |
Extension | 0̊-20 | ||
PIP | Flexion | 100̊ | |
Extension | 0̊ | ||
MCP | Flexion | 90̊ | |
Extension | 30-45̊ |
Section 2 - Determining Impairment Assessments of Musculoskeletal Lower Limb Conditions
Selection of Tables
The tables that may be used to rate impairment from musculoskeletal lower limb conditions are:
Table | Loss of Function | Other Impairment |
---|---|---|
Table 17.9 | Loss of Function - Lower Limbs | This table is used to rate impairment from musculoskeletal conditions which impact on the function of the lower limbs as a whole. |
Table 17.10 | Loss of Function - Lower Limb - Hip | This table is used to rate impairment from musculoskeletal conditions affecting the active range of motion of the hip. |
Table 17.11 | Loss of Function - Lower Limb - Knee | This table is used to rate impairment from musculoskeletal conditions affecting the active range of motion of the knee. |
Table 17.12 | Loss of Function - Lower Limb - Ankle | This table is used to rate impairment from musculoskeletal conditions affecting the active range of motion of the ankle. |
Table 17.13 | Loss of Function - Lower Limb - Feet and Toes | This table is used to rate impairment from musculoskeletal conditions of the feet and toes. |
Table 17.14 | Other Impairment - Fractures of Lower Limbs | This table is used to rate impairment from fractures of the lower limbs. |
Table 17.15 | Other Impairment - Lower Limb - Amputations | This table is used to rate impairment from lower limb amputations. |
Table 17.16 | Other Impairment - Osteomyelitis - Lower Limbs | This table is used to rate impairment from osteomyelitis of the lower limbs. |
Chart 3 | Optimal Position of Joint Ankylosis - Lower Limbs | This chart provides values for the optimal position of an ankylosed joint of the lower limb. |
Chart 4 | Average Range of Joint Motion - Lower Limb | This chart provides values for the average range of motion of specific joints of the lower limb. |
Loss of Function - Lower Limb
Table 17.9 provides criteria for evaluating the ability to use the lower limbs as a functional unit for performing every day activities such as walking and standing. Only one rating may be selected for the lower limbs as a unit. If more than one rating is applicable, the ratings are compared and the highest selected.
This table is used to rate specific conditions which include the following:
- brain injury or disease which affects the function of one or both lower limb(s)
- spinal cord injury or disease which affects the function of one or both lower limb(s)
- complex regional pain syndromes Type 1 and Type 2 of the lower limb(s)
- compartment syndrome of the lower limb(s)
- peripheral neurological conditions affecting the lower limb(s) which are not rated from Table 20.5 contained within Chapter 20, Neurological Impairment.
In cases of spinal cord injury or disease, refer to the instructions provided in the introduction of this chapter.
If more than one condition of the lower limb(s) is to be rated from Table 17.9, the conditions are bracketed for assessment purposes.
When entitled lower limb conditions result in permanent impairment of other organ systems, a consequential entitlement decision is required. If awarded, the resulting impairment of that organ system(s) will be rated using the applicable body system specific table(s).
If non-entitled conditions or conditions rated within another chapter/table of the Table of Disabilities are contributing to the overall impairment, then the PCT must be applied to arrive at the rating which is due to the entitled condition(s) rated within this table.
Loss of Function - Lower Limb - Hip
Table 17.10 is used to rate impairment from musculoskeletal conditions of the hip. Only one rating may be selected for each hip. If more than one rating is applicable, the ratings are compared and the highest selected.
If more than one hip condition of the same limb is to be rated from Table 17.10, the conditions are bracketed for assessment purposes.
When entitled lower limb hip conditions result in permanent impairment of other organ systems, a consequential entitlement decision is required. If awarded, the resulting impairment of that organ system(s) will be rated using the applicable body system specific table(s).
If non-entitled conditions or conditions rated within another chapter/table of the Table of Disabilities are contributing to the overall impairment, then the PCT must be applied to arrive at the rating which is due to the entitled condition(s) rated within this table.
Loss of Function - Lower Limb - Knee
Table 17.11 is used to rate impairment from musculoskeletal conditions of the knee. Only one rating may be selected for each knee. If more than one rating is applicable, the ratings are compared and the highest selected.
If more than one knee condition of the same limb is to be rated from Table 17.11, the conditions are bracketed for assessment purposes.
When entitled lower limb knee conditions result in permanent impairment of other organ systems, a consequential entitlement decision is required. If awarded, the resulting impairment of that organ system(s) will be rated using the applicable body system specific table(s).
If non-entitled conditions or conditions rated within another chapter/table of the Table of Disabilities are contributing to the overall impairment, then the PCT must be applied to arrive at the rating which is due to the entitled condition(s) rated within this table.
Loss of Function - Lower Limb - Ankle
Table 17.12 is used to rate impairment from musculoskeletal conditions of the ankle. Only one rating may be selected for each ankle. If more than one rating is applicable, the ratings are compared and the highest selected.
If more than one ankle condition of the same limb is to be rated from Table 17.12, the conditions are bracketed for assessment purposes.
When entitled lower limb ankle conditions result in permanent impairment of other organ systems, a consequential entitlement decision is required. If awarded, the resulting impairment of that organ system(s) will be rated using the applicable body system specific table(s).
If non-entitled conditions or conditions rated within another chapter/table of the Table of Disabilities are contributing to the overall impairment, then the PCT must be applied to arrive at the rating which is due to the entitled condition(s) rated within this table.
Loss of Function - Lower Limb - Feet and Toes
Table 17.13 is used to rate impairment from musculoskeletal conditions of the feet and toes. Only one rating may be selected for each foot from Table 17.13. If more than one rating is applicable, the ratings are compared and the highest selected.
If more than one foot and/or toe condition of the same limb is to be rated from Table 17.13, the conditions are bracketed for assessment purposes.
When entitled lower limb feet and toe conditions result in permanent impairment of other organ systems, a consequential entitlement decision is required. If awarded, the resulting impairment of that organ system(s) will be rated using the applicable body system specific table(s).
If non-entitled conditions or conditions rated within another chapter/table of the Table of Disabilities are contributing to the overall impairment, then the PCT must be applied to arrive at the rating which is due to the entitled condition(s) rated within this table.
Other Impairment - Fractures of Lower Limbs
Table 17.14 is used to rate impairment from fractures of the lower limbs. One rating may be selected for each entitled condition. If more than one rating is applicable for an entitled condition, the ratings are compared and the highest selected.
If a fracture is intra-articular, the applicable joint table is also used to rate the impairment.
When entitled fractures of the lower limbs result in permanent impairment of other organ systems, a consequential entitlement decision is required. If awarded, the resulting impairment of that organ system(s) will be rated using the applicable body system specific table(s).
If non-entitled conditions or conditions rated within another chapter/table of the Table of Disabilities are contributing to the overall impairment, then the PCT must be applied to arrive at the rating which is due to the entitled condition(s) rated within this table.
Other Impairment - Lower Limb - Amputations
Table 17.15 is used to rate impairment from lower limb amputations. All lower limb amputations regardless of the cause (e.g. vascular, trauma, or infection), are rated from this table. Only one rating may be selected for each lower limb from Table 17.15. If more than one rating is applicable, the ratings are compared and the highest selected.
When previously entitled conditions are later removed by a newly entitled amputation, the new rating is based on Table 17.15 - Other Impairment - Lower Limb - Amputations. However, in rare cases, if there is more than one entitled condition of a lower limb, the sum of the ratings could be higher than the amputation rating. In these cases, the ratings for the previously entitled conditions that applied immediately prior to the amputation are to be maintained.
When entitled lower limb amputations result in permanent impairment of other organ systems, a consequential entitlement decision is required. If awarded, the resulting impairment of that organ system(s) will be rated using the applicable body system specific table(s).
When a non-entitled amputation removes a previously entitled condition(s), the rating for the entitled condition(s) that applied immediately prior to the amputation is to be maintained.
If non-entitled conditions or conditions rated within another chapter/table of the Table of Disabilities are contributing to the overall impairment, then the PCT must be applied to arrive at the rating which is due to the entitled condition(s) rated within this table.
Other Impairment - Osteomyelitis - Lower Limbs
Table 17.16 is used to rate impairment from osteomyelitis of the lower limbs. One rating may be selected for each area of osteomyelitis. If more than one rating is applicable for an area, the ratings are compared and the highest selected.
When entitled osteomyelitis of the lower limbs result in permanent impairment of other organ systems, a consequential entitlement decision is required. If awarded, the resulting impairment of that organ system(s) will be rated using the applicable body system specific table(s).
If non-entitled conditions or conditions rated within another chapter/table of the Table of Disabilities are contributing to the overall impairment, then the PCT must be applied to arrive at the rating which is due to the entitled condition(s) rated within this table.
Tables, Steps and Charts
Table 17.9 - Loss of Function - Lower Limb
Only one rating may be given for the lower limbs as a functional unit from Table 17.9. When more than one rating is applicable, the ratings are compared and the highest selected.
Each bullet (•) represents one criterion. In order for a rating to be established for Table 17.9, follow the "ands" and "ors".
Rating | Criteria |
---|---|
Nil |
|
Two |
|
Four |
|
Nine |
|
Eighteen |
|
Twenty-one |
|
Thirty-four |
|
Fifty-two |
|
Eighty-one |
|
* Intractable pain is severe, persistent, ongoing pain that is unresponsive to the usual treatment modalities.
** Transfer means, for example, to move from one seat to another, from sitting to standing, on and off the toilet, in and out of bed.
Steps to Determine the Musculoskeletal Assessment Lower Limb
- Step 1:
-
Determine the rating from Table 17.9 (Loss of Function - Lower Limb)
Note: This table is used to rate specific conditions which include but are not limited to the following:
- brain injury or disease which affects the function of one or both lower limb(s)
- spinal cord injury or disease which affects the function of one or both lower limb(s)
- complex regional pain syndromes Type 1 and Type 2 affecting the lower limb(s).
- compartment syndrome conditions of the lower limb(s)
- peripheral neurological conditions of the lower limb(s) which are not rated from Table 20.5 contained in Chapter 20, Neurological Impairment.
- Step 2:
- Does the Partially Contributing Table apply? If yes, then apply to rating at Step 1.
- Step 3:
- Determine the Quality of Life rating.
- Step 4:
- Add ratings at Step 2 and Step 3.
- Step 5:
- If partial entitlement exists, apply to the rating at Step 4.
This is the Disability Assessment.
Table 17.10- Loss of Function - Lower Limb - Hip
Only one rating may be given for each hip from Table 17.10. If more than one rating is applicable, the ratings are compared and the highest selected.
Each bullet (•) represents one criterion. In order for a rating to be established for Table 17.10, follow the "ands" and "ors".
Rating | Criteria |
---|---|
Nil |
|
Four |
|
Thirteen |
|
Twenty-six |
|
Thirty-six |
|
Forty-three |
|
Fifty-two |
|
* Flail joint is a joint exhibiting abnormal and paradoxical mobility.
Steps to Determine the Musculoskeletal Assessment - Hip
- Step 1:
- Determine the rating from Table 17.10 (Loss of Function - Lower Limb - Hip).
- Step 2:
- Does the Partially Contributing Table apply? If yes, then apply to rating at Step 1.
- Step 3:
- Determine the Quality of Life rating.
- Step 4:
- Add the ratings at Step 2 and Step 3.
- Step 5:
- If partial entitlement exists, apply to the rating at Step 4.
This is the Disability Assessment.
Table 17.11 - Loss of Function - Lower Limb - Knee
Only one rating may be given for each knee from Table 17.11. If more than one rating is applicable, the ratings are compared and the highest selected.
Each bullet (•) represents one criterion. In order for a rating to be established for Table 17.11, only one criterion must be met at a level of impairment for that rating to be selected.
Rating | Criteria |
---|---|
Nil |
|
Four |
|
Nine |
|
Thirteen |
|
Eighteen |
Two of the following:
|
Twenty-six |
All three of the following:
|
Thirty-four |
|
Forty-three |
|
* A clinically unstable knee describes a knee joint that is demonstrated to be unstable by a physician on clinical or operative examination.
** Flail joint is a joint exhibiting abnormal and paradoxical mobility.
Steps to Determine the Musculoskeletal Assessment - Knee
- Step 1:
- Determine the rating from Table 17.11 (Loss of Function - Lower Limb - Knee).
- Step 2:
- Does the Partially Contributing Table apply? If yes, then apply to rating at Step 1.
- Step 3:
- Determine the Quality of Life rating.
- Step 4:
- Add the ratings at Step 2 and Step 3.
- Step 5:
- If partial entitlement exists, apply to the rating at Step 4.
This is the Disability Assessment.
Table 17.12- Loss of Function - Lower Limb - Ankle
Only one rating may be given for each ankle from Table 17.12. If more than one rating is applicable, the ratings are compared and the highest selected.
Each bullet (•) represents one criterion. In order for a rating to be established for Table 17.12, follow the "ands" and "ors".
Rating | Criteria |
---|---|
Nil |
|
Two |
|
Four |
|
Nine |
|
Thirteen |
|
Eighteen |
|
Twenty-Six |
|
* A clinically unstable ankle describes an ankle joint that is demonstrated to be unstable by a physician on clinical or operative examination.
** Flail joint is a joint exhibiting abnormal and paradoxical mobility.
Steps to Determine the Musculoskeletal Assessment - Ankle
- Step 1:
- Determine the rating from Table 17.12 (Loss of Function - Lower Limb- Ankle).
- Step 2:
- Does the Partially Contributing Table apply? If yes, then apply to rating at Step 1.
- Step 3:
- Determine the Quality of Life rating.
- Step 4:
- Add the ratings at Step 2 and Step 3.
- Step 5:
- If partial entitlement exists, apply to the rating at Step 4.
This is the Disability Assessment.
Table 17.13 - Loss of Function - Lower Limb - Feet and Toes
Table 17.13 is used to rate impairment from musculoskeletal conditions of the feet and toes. Only one rating may be given for each foot from Table 17.13 for any musculoskeletal condition or combination of conditions. If more than one rating is applicable for a foot, the ratings are compared and the highest selected.
All conditions listed in Table 17.13 refer to unilateral conditions.
Conditions rated in Table 17.13 include, but are not limited to:
- pes planus
- pes cavus
- plantar callus
- hammer toes
- claw toe
- mallet toe
- hallux valgus
- hallux rigidus
- turf toe
- sesamoid dysfunction
- metatarsalgia
- plantar fasciitis
- calcaneal spur
- heel pad syndrome
- subcalcaneal pain syndrome
- retrocalcaneal bursitis
- Morton's neuroma
- tendonitis of the foot including anterior fibular, posterior tibial, flexor hallucis longus and peroneal tendons
- ligamentous injury of the foot
- osteoarthritis of any joint of the foot or toes
- bursitis of the foot
- fractures of the phalanges resulting in ankylosis
- subtalar joint osteoarthritis.
Each bullet (•) represents one criterion. In order for a rating to be established for Table 17.13, only one criterion must be met at a level of impairment for that rating to be selected.
Rating | Criteria |
---|---|
Nil |
|
One |
|
Two |
|
Three |
|
Four |
|
Seven |
|
Ankylosis of the subtalar joint in an unfavourable position of function is rated on individual merits.
* Treatment includes use of orthotic devices and use of medications.
Steps to Determine the Musculoskeletal Assessment - Feet and Toes
- Step 1:
-
Determine the rating from Table 17.13 (Loss of Function - Lower Limb - Feet and Toes).
Note: If more than one foot and/or toe condition of a single limb is entitled and requires assessment all entitled conditions of that foot are bracketed together. All applicable ratings are compared and the highest selected.
- Step 2:
- Does the Partially Contributing Table apply? If yes, then apply to rating at Step 1.
- Step 3:
- Determine the Quality of Life rating.
- Step 4:
- Add the ratings at Step 2 and Step 3.
- Step 5:
- If partial entitlement exists, apply to the rating at Step 4.
This is the Disability Assessment.
Table 17.14 - Other Impairment- Fracture of the Lower Limbs
Only one rating may be given for each entitled condition from Table 17.14. If more than one rating is applicable for an entitled condition, the ratings are compared and the highest selected.
Each bullet (•) represents one criterion. In order for a rating to be established for Table 17.14, only one criterion must be met at a level of impairment for that rating to be selected.
Rating | Criteria |
---|---|
Nil |
|
One |
|
Three |
|
Seven |
|
Thirteen |
|
Fractures that result in non-union will be assessed on individual merits.
Fractures of the phalanges resulting in ankylosis will be assessed in Table 17.13.
Steps to Determine Musculoskeletal Assessment Fractures Lower Limb
- Step 1:
- Determine the rating from Table 17.14 (Other Impairment - Fractures Lower Limbs).
- Step 2:
- Does the Partially Contributing Table apply? If yes, then apply to rating at Step 1.
- Step 3:
- Determine the Quality of Life rating.
- Step 4:
- Add the ratings at Step 2 and Step 3.
- Step 5:
- If partial entitlement exists, apply to the rating at Step 4.
This is the Disability Assessment.
Table 17.15 - Other Impairment - Lower Limb - Amputations
Table 17.15 is used to rate impairment from lower limb amputations.
Only one rating may be given for each lower limb from Table 17.15 for entitled amputations. If more than one rating is applicable, the ratings are compared and the highest is selected.
Each bullet (•) in Table 17.15 represents one criterion. Only one criteria must be met at a particular level in Table 17.15 in order for that rating to be selected.
Rating | Criteria |
---|---|
Two |
|
Four |
|
Seven |
|
Thirteen |
|
Eighteen |
|
Twenty-six |
|
Forty-three |
|
Fifty-two |
|
Sixty-one |
|
Sixty-three |
|
Sixty-eight |
|
Seventy-six |
|
* Hind quarter amputation is an amputation of the entire hip joint as well as a portion of the pubic rami and a portion of the ischial tuberosity.
Amputations not included in this table will be rated on individual merits.
Steps to Determine Musculoskeletal Assessment - Lower Limb Amputations
- Step 1:
- Determine the rating from Table 17.15 (Other Impairment - Lower Limb -Amputations).
- Step 2:
- Does the Partially Contributing Table apply? If yes, then apply to rating at Step 1.
- Step 3:
- Determine the Quality of Life rating.
- Step 4:
- Add the ratings at Step 2 and Step 3.
- Step 5:
- If partial entitlement exists, apply to the rating at Step 4.
This is the Disability Assessment.
Table 17.16 - Other Impairment - Osteomyelitis - Lower Limb
One rating may be given for each area of osteomyelitis of the lower limb from Table 17.16. If more than one rating is applicable for an area, the ratings are compared and the highest selected.
Each bullet (•) represents one criterion. In order for a rating to be established for Table 17.16, only one criterion must be met at a level of impairment for that rating to be selected.
Rating | Criteria |
---|---|
One |
|
Four |
|
Nine |
|
Thirteen |
|
Steps to Determine the Lower Limb Osteomyelitis Assessment
- Step 1:
-
Determine the rating from Table 17.16 (Other Impairment - Lower Limb Osteomyelitis).
Note: One rating may be given for each entitled area of osteomyelitis of the lower limbs. The steps must be repeated for each area entitled.
- Step 2:
- Does the Partially Contributing Table apply? If yes, then apply to rating at Step 1.
- Step 3:
- Determine the Quality of Life rating.
- Step 4:
- Add the ratings at Step 2 and Step 3.
- Step 5:
- If partial entitlement exists, apply to the rating at Step 4.
This is the Disability Assessment.
Chart 3 - Optimal Position of Joint Ankylosis - Lower Limb
The following values are a guide. The actual position of a surgical joint ankylosis may vary depending on the judgement of the surgeon taking into account the particular needs and circumstances of the Member/Veteran/Client.
Joint | Optimal Position of Ankylosis |
---|---|
Hip |
25 - 30° of flexion, 0 - 10° external rotation, 2 - 5° of adduction. |
Knee |
10 - 15° flexion with good alignment. |
Ankle |
The neutral position without flexion, extension, varus or valgus. |
Chart 4 - Average Range of Motion of Joints - Lower Limb
Joint | Movement | Range of Movement |
---|---|---|
Hip | Flexion | 120° |
Abduction | 40° | |
Internal rotation | 30° | |
Extension | 30° | |
Adduction | 20° | |
External rotation | 45° | |
Knee | Flexion | 130° |
Extension | 0° | |
Ankle | Dorsiflexion | 25° |
Inversion | 30° | |
Plantar flexion | 40° | |
Eversion | 20° |
Section 3 - Determining Impairment Assessments of Musculoskeletal Spine, Pelvis and Sacroiliac Joints
Selection of Tables
The tables that may be used to rate impairment from musculoskeletal spine, pelvis and sacroiliac joint conditions are:
Table | Loss of Function | Other Impairment |
---|---|---|
Table 17.17 | Loss of Function - Cervical Spine | This table is used to rate impairment from musculoskeletal conditions affecting the cervical spine. |
Table 17.18 | Loss of Function - Thoracic Spine | This table is used to rate impairment from musculoskeletal conditions affecting the thoracic spine. |
Table 17.19 | Loss of Function - Lumbar Spine | This table is used to rate impairment from musculoskeletal conditions affecting the lumbar spine. |
Table 17.20 | Other Impairment - Coccyx, Pelvis and Sacroiliac Joints | This table is used to rate impairment from musculoskeletal conditions affecting the coccyx, pelvis and sacroiliac joints. |
Table 17.21 | Other Impairment - Osteomyelitis - Spine and Pelvis. | This table is used to rate impairment from osteomyelitis of the spine and pelvis. |
Chart 5 | Average Range of Joint Motion - Spine | This chart is used as a reference with regard to the average range of motion of the cervical, thoracic and lumbar spine. |
Chart 6 | Nerve Root Compression Syndromes | This chart describes nerve root compression effects. |
Loss of Function - Cervical Spine
Table 17.17 is used to rate impairment from musculoskeletal conditions of the cervical spine. Only one rating may be selected from Table 17.17. If more than one rating is applicable, the ratings are compared and the highest selected.
If more than one cervical condition is to be rated from Table 17.17, the conditions are bracketed for assessment purposes.
Nerve root compression lesions of the cervical spine are rated from this table.
In cases where a spinal cord injury or disease is to be rated, refer to the instructions provided in the Introduction of this chapter.
When entitled cervical spine conditions result in permanent impairment of other organ systems, a consequential entitlement decision is required. If awarded, the resulting impairment of that organ system(s) will be rated using the applicable body system specific table(s).
If non-entitled conditions or conditions rated within another chapter/table of the Table of Disabilities are contributing to the overall impairment, then the PCT must be applied to arrive at the rating which is due to the entitled condition(s) rated within this table.
Loss of Function - Thoracic Spine
Table 17.18 is used to rate impairment from musculoskeletal conditions of the thoracic spine. Only one rating may be selected from Table 17.18. If more than one rating is applicable, the ratings are compared and the highest selected.
If more than one thoracic spine condition is to be rated from Table 17.18, the conditions are bracketed for assessment purposes.
Nerve root compression lesions due to a thoracic spine condition are rated on individual merits.
In cases where a spinal cord injury or disease is to be rated, refer to the instructions provided in the Introduction of this chapter.
When entitled thoracic spine conditions result in permanent impairment of other organ systems, a consequential entitlement decision is required. If awarded, the resulting impairment of that organ system(s) will be rated using the applicable body system specific table(s).
If non-entitled conditions or conditions rated within another chapter/table of the Table of Disabilities are contributing to the overall impairment, then the PCT must be applied to arrive at the rating which is due to the entitled condition(s) rated within this table.
Loss of Function - Lumbar Spine
Table 17.19 is used to rate impairment from musculoskeletal conditions of the lumbar spine. Only one rating may be selected from Table 17.19. If more than one rating is applicable, the ratings are compared and the highest selected.
If more than one lumbar spine condition is to be rated from Table 17.19, the conditions are bracketed for assessment purposes.
Nerve root compression lesions of the lumbar spine are rated from this table.
In cases where a spinal cord injury or disease is to be rated, refer to the instructions provided in the introduction of this chapter.
When entitled lumbar spine conditions result in permanent impairment of other organ systems, a consequential entitlement decision is required. If awarded, the resulting impairment of that organ system(s) will be rated using the applicable body system specific table(s).
If non-entitled conditions or conditions rated within another chapter/table of the Table of Disabilities are contributing to the overall impairment, then the PCT must be applied to arrive at the rating which is due to the entitled condition(s) rated within this table.
Other Impairment - Coccyx, Pelvis and Sacroiliac Joint Conditions
Table 17.20 is used to rate musculoskeletal impairment from coccyx, pelvis, and sacroiliac joint conditions. A rating may be given from Table 17.20 for each entitled area. If more than one rating is applicable for an area, the ratings are compared and the highest selected.
For purposes of assessment, sacroiliac joint disease is considered to be bilateral.
When entitled conditions of the coccyx, pelvis and sacroiliac joint result in permanent impairment of other organ systems, a consequential entitlement decision is required. If awarded, the resulting impairment of that organ system(s) will be rated using the applicable body system specific table(s).
If non-entitled conditions or conditions rated within another chapter/table of the Table of Disabilities are contributing to the overall impairment, then the PCT must be applied to arrive at the rating which is due to the entitled condition(s) rated within this table.
Other Impairment - Osteomyelitis - Spine and Pelvis
Table 17.21 is used to rate impairment from osteomyelitis of the spine and pelvis. One rating may be selected for each area of osteomyelitis. If more than one rating is applicable for an area, the ratings are compared and the highest selected.
When entitled osteomyelitis of the spine and pelvis results in permanent impairment of other organ systems, a consequential entitlement decision is required. If awarded, the resulting impairment of that organ system(s) will be rated using the applicable body system specific table(s).
If non-entitled conditions or conditions rated within another chapter/table of the Table of Disabilities are contributing to the overall impairment, then the PCT must be applied to arrive at the rating which is due to the entitled condition(s) rated within this table.
Tables, Steps and Charts
Table 17.17 - Loss of Function - Cervical Spine
Only one rating may be given for the cervical spine from Table 17.17. If more than one rating is applicable, the ratings are compared and the highest selected.
Each bullet (•) represents one criterion. In order for a rating to be established for Table 17.17 follow the "ands" and "ors".
Rating | Criteria |
---|---|
Nil |
|
Four |
|
Nine |
|
Thirteen |
|
Eighteen |
|
Twenty-one |
|
Twenty-six |
|
Thirty-four |
|
* Intractable pain is severe, persistent, ongoing pain that is unresponsive to the usual treatment modalities.
Steps to Determine the Assessment for Musculoskeletal Cervical Spine Conditions (Nerve Root Compression Only, e.g. C5, C6, C7 and C8)
- Step 1:
- Determine the rating from Table 17.17 (Loss of Function - Cervical Spine).
- Step 2:
- Does the Partially Contributing Table apply? If yes, then apply to rating at Step 1.
- Step 3:
- Determine the Quality of Life rating.
- Step 4:
- Add the ratings at Step 2 and Step 3.
- Step 5:
- If partial entitlement exists, apply to the rating at Step 4.
This is the Disability Assessment.
Steps to Determine the Assessment for Musculoskeletal Cervical Spine Conditions (Spinal Cord Injury or Disease - Upper Limb Involvement Only)
- Step 1:
- Determine the rating from Table 17.17 (Loss of Function - Cervical Spine).
- Step 2:
- Does the Partially Contributing Table apply? If yes, then apply to rating at Step 1.
- Step 3:
-
Determine a rating from Table 17.1 (Loss of Function - Upper Limb).
Note: If one upper limb is affected, determine a rating for the affected limb. or If both upper limbs are affected, determine the appropriate rating for each limb and add the ratings.
- Step 4:
- Does the Partially Contributing Table apply? If yes, then apply to rating at Step 3.
- Step 5:
- Compare Step 2 and Step 4 and select the highest.
- Step 6:
- Determine the Quality of Life rating.
- Step 7:
- Add the ratings at Step 5 and Step 6.
- Step 8:
- If partial entitlement exists, apply to the rating at Step 7.
This is the Disability Assessment.
Steps to Determine the Assessment for Musculoskeletal Cervical Spine Conditions (Spinal Cord Injury or Disease - Upper and Lower Limb Involvement)
- Step 1:
- Determine the rating from Table 17.17 (Loss of Function - Cervical Spine).
- Step 2:
- Does the Partially Contributing Table apply? If yes, then apply to rating at Step 1.
- Step 3:
- Determine a rating from Chapter 19 (Activities of Daily Living).
- Step 4:
- Does the Partially Contributing Table apply? If yes, then apply to rating at Step 3.
- Step 5:
- Compare Step 2 and Step 4 and select the highest.
- Step 6:
- Determine the Quality of Life rating.
- Step 7:
- Add the ratings at Step 5 and Step 6.
- Step 8:
- If partial entitlement exists, apply to the rating at Step 7.
This is the Disability Assessment.
Table 17.18 - Loss of Function - Thoracic Spine
Only one rating may be given for the thoracic spine from Table 17.18. If more than one rating is applicable, the ratings are compared and the highest selected.
Each bullet (•) represents one criterion. In order for a rating to be established for Table 17.18 all criteria designated at that rating level must be met.
Rating | Criteria |
---|---|
Nil |
|
One |
|
Two |
|
Three |
|
Nine |
|
Thirteen |
|
Note: In rating the thoracic spine, one should concentrate on the rotation movements as opposed to flexion and extension movements which are primarily a function of the lumbar spine.
Nerve root compression lesions of the thoracic spine will be rated on individual merits.
Steps to Determine Musculoskeletal Thoracic Spine Assessment (Nerve Root Compression Only)
- Step 1:
- Determine the rating from Table 17.18 (Loss of Function -Thoracic Spine).
- Step 2:
- Does the Partially Contributing Table apply? If yes, then apply to rating at Step 1.
- Step 3:
- Determine the Quality of Life rating.
- Step 4:
- Add ratings at Step 2 and Step 3.
- Step 5:
- If partial entitlement exists, apply to the rating at Step 4.
This is the Disability Assessment.
Steps to Determine the Musculoskeletal Thoracic Spine Assessment (Spinal Cord Injury or Disease - Upper Limb Involvement Only)
- Step 1:
- Determine the rating from Table 17.18 (Loss of Function -Thoracic Spine).
- Step 2:
- Does the Partially Contributing Table apply? If yes, then apply to rating at Step 1.
- Step 3:
-
Determine the rating(s) from Table 17.1 (Loss of Function - Upper Limbs).
Note: If one upper limb is affected, determine a rating for the affected limb. or If both upper limbs are affected, determine the appropriate rating for each limb and add the ratings.
- Step 4:
- Does the Partially Contributing Table apply? If yes, then apply to rating at Step 3.
- Step 5:
- Compare ratings at Step 2 and Step 4 and select the highest.
- Step 6:
- Determine the Quality of Life rating
- Step 7:
- Add ratings at Step 5 and Step 6.
- Step 8:
- If partial entitlement exists, apply to the rating at Step 7.
This is the Disability Assessment.
Steps to Determine the Musculoskeletal Thoracic Spine Assessment (Spinal Cord Injury or Disease - Lower Limb Involvement Only)
- Step 1:
- Determine the rating from Table 17.18 (Loss of Function -Thoracic Spine).
- Step 2:
- Does the Partially Contributing Table apply? If yes, then apply to rating at Step 1.
- Step 3:
- Determine the rating(s) from Table 17.9 (Loss of Function - Lower Limbs).
- Step 4:
- Does the Partially Contributing Table apply? If yes, then apply to rating at Step 3.
- Step 5:
- Compare ratings at Step 2 and Step 4 and select the highest.
- Step 6:
- Determine the Quality of Life rating.
- Step 7:
- Add ratings at Step 5 and Step 6.
- Step 8:
- If partial entitlement exists, apply to the rating at Step 7.
This is the Disability Assessment.
Steps to Determine the Musculoskeletal Thoracic Spine Assessment (Spinal Cord Injury or Disease - Upper and Lower Limb Involvement)
- Step 1:
- Determine the rating from Table 17.18 (Loss of Function -Thoracic Spine).
- Step 2:
- Does the Partially Contributing Table apply? If yes, then apply to rating at Step 1.
- Step 3:
- Determine rating from Chapter 19 (Activities of Daily Living).
- Step 4:
- Does the Partially Contributing Table apply? If yes, then apply to rating at Step 3.
- Step 5:
- Compare ratings at Step 2 and Step 4 and select the highest.
- Step 6:
- Determine the Quality of Life rating.
- Step 7:
- Add ratings at Step 5 and Step 6.
- Step 8:
- If partial entitlement exists, apply to the rating at Step 7.
This is the Disability Assessment.
Table 17.19 - Loss of Function - Lumbar Spine
Only one rating may be given for the lumbar spine from Table 17.19. If more than one rating is applicable, the ratings are compared and the highest selected.
Each bullet (•) represents one criterion. In order for a rating to be established for Table 17.19, follow the "ands" and "ors".
Rating | Criteria |
---|---|
Nil |
|
Four |
|
Nine |
|
Thirteen |
|
Eighteen |
|
Twenty-one |
|
Thirty-one |
|
Thirty-four |
|
Thirty-nine |
|
* Sciatica is defined as pain radiating in the distribution of a lumbar or sacral dermatome, below the level of the knee with or without associated neurosensory and motor deficits.
** Intractable pain is severe, persistent, ongoing pain that is unresponsive to the usual treatment modalities.
Steps to Determine the Assessment for Musculoskeletal Lumbar Spine (Nerve Root Compression Only, e.g. L4, L5 and S1)
- Step 1:
- Determine the rating from Table 17.19 (Loss of Function - Lumbar Spine).
- Step 2:
- Does the Partially Contributing Table apply? If yes, then apply to rating at Step 1.
- Step 3:
- Determine the Quality of Life rating.
- Step 4:
- Add ratings at Step 2 and Step 3.
- Step 5:
- If partial entitlement exists, apply to the rating at Step 4.
This is the Disability Assessment.
Steps to Determine the Assessment for Musculoskeletal Lumbar Spine (Spinal Cord Injury or Disease - Lower Limb Involvement)
- Step 1:
- Determine the rating from Table 17.19 (Loss of Function - Lumbar Spine).
- Step 2:
- Does the Partially Contributing Table apply? If yes, then apply to rating at Step 1.
- Step 3:
- Determine rating from Table 17.9 (Loss of Function - Lower Limb(s) ( if applicable).
If an entitled lumbar spinal cord injury or disease condition affects the function of one or both lower limbs, a rating is necessary from Table 17.9 (Loss of Function - Lower Limb). Regardless if one or both lower limbs are affected, the appropriate rating from Table 17.9 is compared to the Table 17.19 rating and the highest selected.
- Step 4:
- Does the Partially Contributing Table apply? If yes, then apply to rating at Step 3.
- Step 5:
- Compare the Step 2 and Step 4 ratings and select the highest.
- Step 6:
- Determine the Quality of Life rating.
- Step 7:
- Add ratings at Step 5 and Step 6.
- Step 8:
- If partial entitlement exists, apply to the rating at Step 7.
This is the Disability Assessment.
Table 17.20 - Other Impairment - Coccyx, Pelvis and Sacroiliac Joints
Only one rating may be given from Table 17.20 for each of the following areas: coccyx, pelvis and sacroiliac joints. For purposes of assessment, sacroiliac joint disease is considered to be bilateral. If more than one rating is applicable for an area, the ratings are compared and the highest selected.
Each bullet (•) represents one criterion. In order for a rating to be established for Table 17.20, only one criterion must be met at a level of impairment for that rating to be selected.
Rating | Criteria |
---|---|
Nil |
|
One |
|
Four |
|
Seven |
|
Thirteen |
|
Thirty-four |
|
* Intractable pain is severe, persistent, ongoing pain that is unresponsive to the usual treatment modalities.
Steps to Determine the Musculoskeletal Assessment Coccyx, Pelvis and Sacroiliac Joint(s)
- Step 1:
-
Determine the rating from Table 17.20 (Other Impairment - Coccyx, Pelvis and Sacroiliac joint[s]).
Note: One rating is selected from Table 17.20 for each entitled condition of the coccyx and pelvis.
One rating is selected from Table 17.20 for entitled conditions of the sacroiliac joints regardless ofether the condition is unilateral or bilateral.
The steps must be repeated for each area entitled.
- Step 2:
- Does the Partially Contributing Table apply? If yes, apply to the rating(s) at Step 1.
- Step 3:
- Determine the Quality of Life rating(s).
- Step 4:
- Add ratings at Step 2 and Step 3.
- Step 5:
- If partial entitlement exists, apply to the rating(s) at Step 4.
This is the Disability Assessment.
Table 17.21 - Other Impairment - Osteomyelitis - Spine and Pelvis
Only one rating may be given from Table 17.21 for each area of osteomyelitis affecting the spine and pelvis. If more than one rating is applicable for an area, the ratings are compared and the highest selected.
Each bullet (•) represents one criterion. In order for a rating to be established for Table 17.21, all criteria designated at that rating level must be met.
Rating | Criteria |
---|---|
One |
|
Four |
|
Nine |
|
Thirteen |
|
Steps to Determine Assessment from Osteomyelitis - Spine and Pelvis
- Step 1:
-
Determine the rating from Table 17.21 (Other Impairment -Osteomyelitis - Spine and Pelvis).
Note: One rating may be given for each entitled area of osteomyelitis of the spine and pelvis.
The steps must be repeated for each area entitled.
- Step 2:
- Does the Partially Contributing Table apply? If yes, then apply to the rating at Step 1.
- Step 3:
- Determine the Quality of Life rating.
- Step 4:
- Add the ratings at Step 2 and Step 3
- Step 5:
- If partial entitlement exists, apply to the rating at Step 4.
This is the Disability Assessment.
Chart 5 - Average Range of Joing Motion - Spine
Joint | Movement | Range of Movement |
---|---|---|
Cervical Spine | Flexion | 60° |
Right lateral flexion | 45° | |
Right rotation | 70° | |
Extension | 60° | |
Left lateral flexion | 45° | |
Left rotation | 70° | |
Thoraco-lumbar Spine* | Flexion | 90° |
Right lateral flexion | 35° | |
Right rotation | 35° | |
Extension | 30° | |
Left lateral flexion | 35° | |
Left rotation | 35° |
* As a general rule each thoracic vertebrae contributes to about 3 degrees of flexion (3 x 12 = 36 degrees total flexion due to the thoracic spine) and each lumbar vertebrae to about 9 degrees of flexion (9 x 5 = 45 degrees total flexion due to lumbar spine) for a total flexion of the thoracolumbar spine of 81 degrees.
Chart 6 - Nerve Root Compression Syndromes
This chart provides a description of the common findings associated with nerve root compression syndromes at the cervical and lumbar spine levels.
Nerve Root | Nerve Root Compression Effects |
---|---|
C5 Root Compression Syndrome |
|
C6 Root Compression Syndrome |
|
C7 Root Compression Syndrome |
|
C8 Root Compression Syndrome |
|
L4 Root Compression Syndrome |
|
L5 Root Compression Syndrome |
|
S1 Root Compression Syndrome |
|