The following definitions are used to classify the ranking of recommendations and the audit opinion presented in this report.
| Critical |
Relates to one or more significant weaknesses for which no adequate compensating controls exist. The weakness results in a high level of risk. |
|---|---|
| Essential | Relates to one or more significant weaknesses for which no adequate compensating controls exist. The weakness results in a moderate level of risk. |
| Well Controlled |
Only insignificant weaknesses relating to the control objectives or sound management of the audited activity are identified. |
|---|---|
| Generally Acceptable |
Identified weaknesses when taken individually or together are not significant or compensating mechanisms are in place. The control objectives or sound management of the audited activity are not compromised. |
| Requires Improvement |
Identified weaknesses, when taken individually or together, are significant and may compromise the control objectives or sound management of the audited activity. |
| Unsatisfactory | The resources allocated to the audited activity are managed without due regard to most of the criteria for efficiency, effectiveness and economy. |