ROE’s Different in Every Operation
Heroes Remember
ROE’s Different in Every Operation
Rules of engagement under the
United Nations and, you know, I
I don't want to sit here as an expert
on rules of engagement.
Every operation has a different
rule of engagement or different
rules of engagement and
they can be more liberal or more
conservative depending on the operation.
Largely speaking or loosely speaking,
the United Nations operations tend to be much
more restrictive in their rules of engagement than,
for example, Afghanistan or even
Somalia for example, because it wasn’t a
United Nations operation per se.
There is a difference between
United Nations operations and United Nations
sanctioned operation.
So the rules of engagement certainly on the first
deployment were very, very, very restrictive.
Very restrictive and very complicated.
In fact, so complicated that even for us
more senior guys it was kind of scratch your
head to make sure that you understood
them clear enough that you didn’t get
yourself in hot water.
We went so far as to plasticize little cards and
have the soldiers tape it to the butt of their
rifles so that they would know the
rules of engagement and
wouldn’t get themselves in trouble.
And it caused a lot of angst because
they were so ambiguous that you didn’t know, and
we were really worried about that as
leadership because the last thing you want
is a solider to second guess whether he
should shoot or not.
At the end of the day keeping warring
factions apart is your mission but
the ultimate mission as far as I am concerned is
getting your soldiers home safe and sound
having completed their job and
if they are in doubt about when
they can engage and
not engage and they take the
split second extra because they are
confused and that gets them killed,
then there is something wrong.
It is a soldier’s job to put himself or herself in
harm’s way but not to put themselves in
harm’s way unnecessarily
or because of ambiguous instructions.
Related Videos
- Date modified: